A Sophist is a hunter of young boys by the way.
Clearly I ll have to read this again I suspect God kills a kitten every time Theaetetus says clearly definitely, of course BECAUSE NONE OF THAT IS CLEAR AT ALL.
I became interested in Sophist through Heidegger I ve read a bunch of Plato s dialogues before, I can t remember which, I read them without any guide they impressed me as mildly amusing, beyond that it s completely mysterious to me how anyone can walk away with any sort of certainty, or conclusion Plato always leaves me feeling trolled The nice thing about reading backwards from modern signposts is that I get to appreciate other people s interpretive efforts I don t think I could have taken this dialogue very seirously if I didn t know it inspired so many generations of p Is A Classical Greek Philosopher, Mathematician, Student Of Socrates, Writer Of Philosophical Dialogues, And Founder Of The Academy In Athens, The First Institution Of Higher Learning In The Western World Along With His Mentor, Socrates, And His Student, Aristotle, Plato Helped To Lay The Foundations Of Western Philosophy And Science Plato Is One Of The Most Important Western Philosophers, Exerting Influence On Virtually Every Figure In Philosophy After Him His Dialogue The Republic Is Known As The First Comprehensive Work On Political Philosophy Plato Also [Plato] ✓ Σοφιστής [high-fantasy PDF] Ebook Epub Download ↠´ Contributed Foundationally To Ethics, Metaphysics, And Epistemology His Student, Aristotle, Is Also An Extremely Influential Philosopher And The Tutor Of Alexander The Great Of Macedonia Sophist is one of the few Platonic dialogues which don t have Socrates as the main character all are from the late period This seems to offer Plato some advantages, especially for this book s purposes Using the Eleatic Visitor as the main speaker allows Plato to make sustained arguments consisting of series of positive statements as opposed to the Socratic character s standard approach, claiming to know nothing and play the midwife of others thoughts asking questions, testing answers, usually showing their inadequacy, and typically ending inconclusively Arguably Plato could have used Socrates the same way he used the Visitor, but that would have been odd as Socrates is the main speaker in the Theaetetus, Sophist s predecessor in a trilogy, in which Socrates is true to his old form Sophist is an attack on Plato s adversaries, the sophists, and ó Σοφιστής É Bilmek ve bilinmek sizce etki midir, etkilenme midir yoksa her ikisi birden midir Platon, Sofist.
80Antik a n lanetli biraderleri olan sofistler, ilk ba ta, bilgiyi sorgulayarak ve pheyi d nceye sokarak felsefe sahnesine nefis bir giri yapm lard Pek k sa bir zaman i erisinde bu sorgulama ve phe tehlikeli bir ak l y r tmeye ve sonra da kullan l , kaypak bir ilkeye d n t D nmek, var olan bir eyi d nmektir Yanl d nmek ise var olmayan bir eyi d nmektir Var olmayan bir ey d n lemez O halde yanl d nmek ve dolay s yla yanl konu mak m mk n de ildir Bu ilkeden hareketle k lan yolda Sofistler, sanatlar ve hatta erdemleri, kendileri bunlara h kim olmasalar bile dil becerisiyle ba kalar na para kar l nda retmeye ba lad lar Sonunda Protagoras, i i Atina n n pek sevgili tanr lar n n ger ekte var olup olmad klar n n bilinemeyece ine kadar vard r nca ehirden s r ld ve O.
k Since now, whenever somebody asks me what s the point of reading Plato after nearly 2500 years, I can laught earnestly.
This was a truly extraordinary experience Plato is quite regardful writer, he makes sure everybody s got the point before he moves on Trying to define and succeding in it which is a nice change from Hippias Major the concept of Sophist, he manage to designate a neat classification of all human activity, prove that Non Being exists, define the concepts of Being, Not Being, Sameness, Difference, Motion and Rest and just along the way find the definition of Philosophist Time good spend.
Opposites time all the time in this dialogue Trying to break down in the most tedious line of questions of what is being and what is non being This dialogue was dragging for a while near the end and then it wraps up without much of a conclusion in a matter of phrases Certainly didn t feel conclusive to me Nothing particularly reflective for me with this dialogue and it neither impressed me nor offended.
Not very interesting
By the middle of the book here s what I really wanted to see happen STRANGER There are some who imitate, knowing what they imitate, andsome who do not know And what line of distinction can there possibly be greater than that which divides ignorance from knowledge THEAETETUS There can be no greater.
STRANGER Was not the sort of imitation of which we spoke just now theimitation of those who know For he who would imitate you would surelyknow you and your figure THEAETETUS Naturally.
STRANGER And what would you say of the figure or form of justice or ofvirtue in general Are we not well aware that many, having no knowledgeof either, but only a sort of opinion, do their best to show that thisopinion is really entertained by them, by expressing it, as far as theycan, in word and deed PUNCH Being and Non BeingPlato begins his dialogue with the purpose of defining what is the sophist In its various partial investigations, I believe that all of the most important is that the accounts of the nature of the non being Contrary to what we can intuit the non being is not necessarily the opposite of being , but only something other than being In my view, this is the central argument that allows the philosopher continue and correctly complete their investigation into the being of the sophist.
Lisbon Book Fair 2016.